In the last issue of The VVA Veteran,
we published VVA's 2006
Legislative Agenda and Policy Initiatives. Using this
booklet, Rick Weidman, Bernie Edelman, Sharon Hodge, from our
Government Relations staff; Carl Tuvin and Jim Kuhn, our
legislative consultants; and I spent several days in recent weeks
visiting our Senators and Representatives in their offices on
Capitol Hill.
For a few days, John Miterko, our
Government Affairs Committee chair, and Al Gibson, a member of our
Board of Directors and ETaBO Committee chair, joined us. Between
us we visited over forty offices.
While we met mainly with senior staffers,
we also spoke to more than two dozen Senators and Representatives
face to face. As often happens in these kinds of exercises, we
also were able to chat with many other Senators and
Representatives we met as we walked through the halls of Congress.
In all of these encounters, we pointed out
the areas that are critical for the effective and efficient
delivery of health care services and service-connected disability
benefits earned by veterans—especially funding, accountability,
and outreach.
In each of these meetings, we pointed out
that we believed these items were important because Vietnam
veterans are suffering from Agent Orange-related illnesses and
will require more health care than any previous generation of
veterans. While our numbers may be smaller than our predecessors,
our health care needs for service- connected illnesses are
greater.
I also had the privilege of testifying on
your behalf before the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee and the
House Appropriations Subcommittee on Military Quality of Life,
Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies. While we cannot take
complete credit, I am glad to report that a few days after our
testimony, Rep. Steve Buyer (R-Ind.), chair of the Veterans’
Affairs Committee, announced a proposal to add $1.9 billion to the
administration’s VA budget proposal, earmarking specific items for
increased staff in the Veterans Benefits Administration to help
with the backlog on claims, one of our main concerns.
This effort was a good start, but it must
be followed up by your efforts in the field. Take the Legislative
Agenda to your local elected officials. Get them to draw up
resolutions supporting our positions. Go to the local office of
the Representatives and Senators in your state, and ask them how
they feel about these issues. Most of the people we spoke to were
sympathetic, although some were concerned about costs. We reminded
them that veterans’ benefits are the long-term costs of war that
must be met.
One way of getting out the word is a town
hall meeting. Elsewhere in this edition is a “how-to” on these
programs developed by our colleagues in Florida. Consider putting
on such a program in your area. You might also consider inviting
your Member of Congress to a chapter or state council meeting like
Chapter 77 in Buffalo, N.Y., did. This way they can get to know
their local veterans, as well as our needs.
During our travels on Capitol Hill we
became aware of two issues of interest to retirees: proposed
increased fees in the Tricare health care program, and the so-
called “widows tax.” The first issue speaks for itself. The second
issue is more complicated. Military personnel can avail themselves
of a Special Benefits Plan, which allows their spouse to receive a
portion of their pensions upon their death. However, if the
retiree dies of a service-connected illness or in any other way
enables the spouse to be entitled to Dependent Indemnity
Compensation (DIC), the pension is reduced, dollar for dollar, by
the amount of DIC received. This is unconscionable.
Look for the articles in this edition that
provide more detail on these issues. They would like to separate
the retirees from the veterans community, but we are all veterans.
As I noted last time, if you need any
assistance, please contact our Government Relations team in the
national office. Remember, together we are unbeatable.