FIND A VET
I'm a Vietnam vet. I served with the 374th RRC (ASA)
attached to the 4th Division in Pleiku from November 1966
till April 1967 then went to the 509th RR Gp in Saigon from
April till November 1967. Though I'm not a member of VVA, I
saw your September‑October issue which had several small
photos across the lower part of the cover. The veteran
pictured on the left is wearing a round patch above his name
tag that I think is from an Internet group I belong to now
called the Pleiku Pals. The veteran pictured on the fourth
from the left is wearing an ASA patch above his sergeant
stripes and to the right of the 4th Division patch. Do you
have names to go with these guys? I would really like to see
if I can find them and get in contact.
Michael Hannan
hannans@tellico.net
FUNDING THE PLAQUE
Thank you
for the In Memory Plaque Project article and update in your
November commemorative issue. The Plaque, to be placed near
the Three Servicemen Statue, will provide year‑round
recognition at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial for those men
and women whose premature postwar deaths are due to their
service, but whose names are ineligible to be added to
The Wall, including, but not limited to, those lost to
illnesses related to Agent Orange exposure and the effects
of PTSD.
The
memorial plaque will only be installed and dedicated after
full funding is assured. Individual, organizational, and
corporate donations in the form of checks or money orders
payable to "ABMC ‑ VVM Plaque" may be sent to:
The
American Battle Monuments Commission
Courthouse Plaza II, Suite 500
Attn: Vietnam Veterans Memorial Plaque
2300 Clarendon Boulevard
Arlington, VA 22201
Ruth Coder Fitzgerald
Fredericksburg, Virginia
NOT THE CAV
There's an error on the Jack
Smith article in the December issue. You better look closer
at that photo. Those cats are wearing a Big Red One on the
shoulder. That ain't the 1st Cav.
T.M. Fitzgerald
Via e-mail
Editor's note: T.M.
Fitzgerald, who served with Company B, 2/18 of the Army's
First Infantry Division (the "Big Red One") in Vietnam, is
correct. The soldiers depicted in the Henri Huet photograph
in the article "Stay Alive" are indeed not members of the
First Cavalry Division. We regret the error and thank Mr.
Fitzgerald for putting us straight.
A SMALL BURDEN LIFTED
I would
like to thank you for the September/October issue and the
November Special Commemorative issue. These are excellent
publications, which I read cover to cover. I would
especially like to thank you for the outstanding article,
"Death On The Liberty," by William Triplett. It was well
written and told the story we try to tell every day ‑ a
story that no one in Washington wants to hear.
As a
survivor of the Liberty, the senior enlisted man
on‑board, one of the founders of the Liberty Veterans
Association, and one who held the horrors inside my head and
heart for nearly twenty years, every time someone takes the
time to listen or to write and support me and my shipmates,
a small load comes off my shoulders.
Stan White
Via e‑mail
LIBERTY MYTHS
The
September/October issue had a well‑written article about the
U.S.S. Liberty by William Triplett that is
unfortunately not factually accurate in many respects and
repeats myths that have been refuted or discredited long
ago. I mean no disrespect toward the victims of the tragedy.
I hold them in high regard. In fact, I was the first person
to endow a chair in honor of The Liberty and
Liberty crew members at the Naval Memorial in
Washington.
I spent 38
years in the Navy and Naval Reserve. During the sixties, I
flew volunteer airlifts to Vietnam. I researched this
subject for almost 15 years and have published a book,
The Liberty Incident. Mr. Triplett perpetuates the myth
that the Medal of Honor award Capt. McGonagle received
"little media attention." Capt. McGonagle, however, had his
picture in The New York Times and The Washington
Post.
There are
other items in the article ‑ some major, some minor ‑ that
should be treated more fully. For example, the Liberty
was dispatched to the eastern Mediterranean on May 24, 1967,
not "when the war broke out," twelve days later as the
article stated.
Investigations were conducted by the U.S. Navy Court of
Inquiry, the CIA, the DOD, and the President's Foreign
Intelligence Board, all of which concluded that the incident
was a tragic mistake resulting from mistakes made by both
the United States and Israel. The Johnson administration
accepted the Israeli explanation. In 1981, NSA agreed with
other agencies. Likewise, eight U.S. presidents agreed.
All the
alleged motives mentioned in the article have been refuted
or discredited by competent evidence over the years. No
mention is made thereof and a reading of the article leaves
the impression that the motives stand unchallenged.
A. Jay
Cristol
Miami, Florida