December 2000/January 2001
Veterans Benefits Update
VA Acts On New Legislation
By Leonard J. Selfon, Director, Veterans Benefits Program
As reported in the last issue, Congress recently enacted the Veterans
Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA). The VCAA overturned a decade of
court decisions concerning the requirement that a claimant for VA benefits
submit a well-grounded claim before the VA will develop the evidence
surrounding that claim. The VA is in the process of issuing new
regulations to implement this important legislation.
Specifically, the VCAA essentially restores the VA’s duty to help
with the factual development of a claim for benefits as soon as the
claimant files a complete or substantially complete application by
notifying the claimant of any information or evidence necessary to
substantiate the claim. The VA is then required to make reasonable efforts
to help a claimant by securing evidence that the claimant identifies and
authorizes the VA to obtain. If obtaining a new medical opinion is
necessary for the VA to make a decision on the claim, the VA must provide
the claimant with a VA physical or psychiatric examination.
In letters to the VA regional offices around the country, the VA’s
Compensation and Pension Service has provided claim-processing guidelines
to adjudicators that address changes mandated by the new legislation. In
this respect, the VA has acknowledged that "the duty to assist
legislation was a clear message from the Congress that they want VA to
help veterans develop their claims."
These policies essentially will govern VA benefits claims adjudication
until final administrative regulations are issued.
It is important to note that the VCAA allows any claimant whose claim
was denied for not being well grounded and had become final (that is, not
appealed or denied on appeal) between July 14, 1999 (the date of the
Morton decision), and July 9, 2000 (the effective date of the VCAA),
to request readjudication if a motion for reconsideration is filed within
two years of the effective date of the Act, November 9, 2002. If you have
received such a denial within the specified period, please contact your
local V.A. service representative to determine if a motion for
reconsideration is warranted. In this respect, the VA has announced a
policy of readjudicating all claims that its adjudicators discover have
satisfied the reconsideration criteria without the claimant having to file
a motion.
VA Recognizes Link Between Diabetes & Agent Orange Exposure
Almost a decade ago, Congress passed Public Law 102-4, the Agent Orange
Act of 1991, which gave the Secretary of Veterans Affairs the authority to
establish presumptive service connection for diseases scientifically
demonstrated to be associated with exposure to the chemical defoliant
Agent Orange, dioxin, and other herbicides during military service in
Vietnam. This means that whenever the Secretary determines, on the basis
of sound medical and scientific evidence, that a positive association
exists between such exposure and the subsequent onset of a disease, the VA
must issue a regulation providing that a presumption of service connection
is warranted for that disease.
Currently, nine diseases are presumptively considered to be the result
of exposure to herbicidal agents used in Vietnam during the war: chloracne
or other acneform disease consistent with chloracne; Hodgkin’s disease;
acute and subacute peripheral neuropathy; porphyria Ceduna Tara; multiple
myeloma; non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; prostate cancer; respiratory cancers
(cancer of the lung, bronchus, larynx, or trachea); and certain specified
soft-tissue sarcomas. Furthermore, exposure to these agents has been shown
to be so detrimental that VA health care, vocational training, and a
monetary allowance are available for children of Vietnam veterans who
suffer from spina bifida.
In April and October 2000, V.A. petitioned the VA to amend its
regulations to include adult-onset diabetes mellitus (type II) as a
presumptively service-connected disease resulting from exposure to Agent
Orange and other herbicides. These petitions were based on government
studies and a report by the National Academy of Sciences’
Institute of Medicine (I’M). In its report, the I’M concluded that
there is "limited/suggestive evidence" of an association between
exposure to herbicides used in Vietnam and adult-onset diabetes type II.
Although the I’M did not find a clear link, the level of association
found is sufficient to require the VA to add diabetes to the presumptive
list. Consequently, the VA on January 11, 2001, published a proposed
regulation that allows presumptive service connection for adult-onset
diabetes. Awards of service connection in this respect will probably not
be retroactive. In other words, a new claim will have to be filed
regardless of whether a veteran has been denied service connection for
diabetes in the past. The VA estimates that there will be some $3.3
billion in related benefits during the next five years. V.A. is in the
process of preparing comments on the proposed regulation, which the VA
will consider before it issues a final regulation. We will keep you
posted.
Beware Of VA Benefits Scam
Early in January, the VA issued a warning to veterans and their
dependents concerning a financial scam that offers a one-time lump-sum
payment in exchange for monthly VA disability compensation or pension
checks. The direct sale of VA benefits is illegal; so is the VA from
paying benefits to anyone other than a veteran, a dependent, or a lawful
guardian. This scam attempts to skirt the law by characterizing these
transactions as loans. The perpetrators try to convince veterans to
give up their benefits checks for a specified period in exchange for a
lump-sum payment that represents 30 to 40 cents on the dollar.
Veterans are sometimes told that they must take out a life insurance
policy that names the perpetrator as a beneficiary. If you are approached
with such a scheme, please report the occurrence to the VA Inspector
General at 1-800-827-1000. |